We’re not tempted by the quick fix anymore. We know about the quick fix, the distraction of it and it’s flimsy backbone. At this point it’s easy to see the quick fix and not be tricked into going for it.
But we also believe we can out smart the long game.
We would never claim to be shooting for over night success, but certainly believe we’re better than being last in line.
Then again, behind all of this is the metrics we’re measuring. What are they and who decided?
We don’t believe in the short line and we don’t want want to be last in line.
“People got around Keith and they thought they were Keith”- Mick, talking about how people would ramp up their drug use because of how hard Keith could go.
You become like the people you’re around.
One differentiator I see between the upper and lower echelon of artists is this…
Artists in the upper echelon don’t take a break just because they experience some success from working hard. They go hard, get some wins, and keep going hard. The break come when necessary…but they don’t see taking a break as a reward for doing a great job.
Artists in the lower echelon often have a hard time sustaining a build because they think it’s a process of ramping up and then ramping down, up, down, up down. They see relaxing as a reward for their effort.
It’s a lot more likely you’ll become an upper echelon artist if you hang out with others who are at least acting like they are too in this way.
Breaking Bad is great when you’ve watched it from the beginning.
Seinfeld is great when you watch it at any point.
Both are great.
Do people need to start at the beginning and be along for the ride for your thing to be great? Or can they jump on the bandwagon at any point and have just as good of time?
What do people need to know before they get it, before they’re all in?